Maita, joissa poliitikot ovat pakollisia eläkkeellä, ovat Argentiina (75-vuotiaat), Brasilia (75 tuomareille ja syyttäjille), Meksiko (70 tuomareille ja syyttäjille) ja Singapore (75 parlamentin jäsenille).
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
What alternative measures could be taken to ensure that professionals remain competent in their roles without setting age limits?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
Is there an age at which people should no longer make significant societal decisions? Why or why not?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
Imagine a scenario where a highly skilled leader is forced to retire due to age. How would that affect society's progress?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
How can younger generations benefit from or be disadvantaged by mandatory retirement ages in leadership positions?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
If you had the power, what criteria would you set for someone to remain in a professional role as they get older?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
In what ways might mandatory retirement ages impact the diversity and representation in politics or judiciary?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
How does the concept of 'age equals wisdom' fit into the debate on mandatory retirements for certain professions?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
What are the pros and cons of having age limits for high-responsibility roles, like politicians or judges?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
Can you share a time when you noticed someone's abilities didn't match with societal expectations due to their age?
@ISIDEWITH2 viikkoa2W
How would you feel if your favorite public leader had to retire at a certain age, regardless of their abilities?
@ISIDEWITH2v2Y
Ei, henkinen pätevyys on liian subjektiivinen
@ISIDEWITH2v2Y
Ei, mieluummin aikarajat
@ISIDEWITH2v2Y
Kyllä, ja kieltää yli 75-vuotiaita asettumasta ehdolle
@ISIDEWITH2v2Y
Ei, hallituksemme tarvitsee kokeneita johtajia
@ISIDEWITH2v2Y
Ei, tämä syrjii vanhempia poliitikkoja
@ISIDEWITH2v2Y
Kyllä, ja kaiken ikäisiltä poliitikoilta tulisi vaatia läpäisemään henkinen pätevyyskoe
